Skip to main content

Wade Pulliam Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

This proposed rule is clearly an attempt by elites to keep the individual investor from taking advantage of their terrible public policy. If this investor were to see that the government was spending too much money and going to cause inflation, how are they to protect their portfolio or actually take advantage of this mismanagement. Betting against Treasuries, like using TBT, would provide that function. How else can the individual investor make money? Sure, the elites can figure out a path. But this rules keeps everyone else down.

William Terhune Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

It's called a hedge. I want to be able to do the same thing the big institutions do. If I'm smart enough to buy long positions, I'm smart enough to short. As per usual, you are dumping on small investors and helping big banks aka: your donors. This isn't just stupid, it's anti American. It's my money, if I want to hedge, it's my business. Stay out of my business and stay out of the markets.

Rich Freeman Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have inverse funds in my investment accounts. They are a portion of the accounts, not the majority of the accounts. These funds bring some additional diversity and balance to my accounts. I am investing money that I have earned throughout my career, and I should be able to do that as I see fit without government regulation either adding needless tasks for me to accomplish or restrict my investment earning potential. Both of my brokerage accounts already include warnings and information about the inverse funds I trade. These warning pop up before I can submit each trade.