Skip to main content

Michael McCarrell Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

This rule is so un-necessary. Leveraged and inverse funds are extremely important to my families investment strategy. I use hedges and stop losses and paid advice from investors with over 30 yrs experience to carefully manage these funds. These are a small but very important part of my portfolio and it makes no sense to have to pass a test to make these well thought out and previously successful investments. I very much oppose this ruling. Thank you for you time.

Frederic Fung Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am already a experienced investor that understands the pros and cons of investing in leveraged, inverse and leveraged inverse mutual funds. In fact in rhe product offers of these types of Investments have been decreasing much to my consternation. There are already attestations that must be made by my brokerage firm before I can invest. I don't need anymore restrictions. Even the proposed ones are tolerable to EXCEPT for the cooling off period proposal, that one is intolerable. Thank you.

Mohammad Asad Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Here is my comments on this issue. We should have a right to choose the investment that are right for us. all investment including leverage fund should be open for everybody with out any discrimination . If you want to impose the restriction on the leverage and inverse fund than it should be restricted to the high net worth individuals and the fund managers because they are the one who manipulates the market with the help of the regulators like the one who proposed this. As my investment strategy I always use leverage fund particularly inverse fund to hedge my portfolio.

Gary Carr Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I strongly oppose the proposed FINRA regulation that would restrict my ability to easily invest in public securities that FINRA deems "complex products" such as leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding the risk issues related to these investments and I don't need any nanny state to "protect" me from making bad choices. I use such investments, which are a limited part of my portfolio for achieving certain investment goals that I select. Having a governmental body deciding whether I am capable of making my own investment choices is ridiculous!