Skip to main content

Nathan Coleman Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on you. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies.

Wayne Chudleigh Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am opposed to a plan which makes restrictions on being able to buy and sell inverse funds without jumping through a variety of hoops to get permission. However, it would be good to have rules on the prospectus documents explaining in very clear language what the unusual risks are from using the funds. The special coverage of risks could be put right at the beginning of the prospectus and highlighted as especially important to read and understand.

Roy Leslie Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I would appreciate FINRA supporting people like me who wish to trade ETFs and leveraged ETFs especially in IRA accounts where we can control the gains and losses in our accounts. In my case I have over 50 years experience in the markets and would prefer making my own decisions without interference from outside sources. Shorts arent allowed in some accounts and the only way to protect holdings in a down market is to own a few ETFs in things like SQQQ and SPY. Thanks for all you do for the financial industry.