Skip to main content

Barbara Thibault Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15 I vehemently oppose restrictions to my right to invest in public investments. I am able to chose the public investments that are right for me and discuss with financial advisor as needed. These investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. There shouldnt be any special process like passing a test before investing in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am able to understand these funds and their risks. I dont want any measures to limit my ability to invest in these public investments imposed on me.

Rixey Jenkins Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose the proposed rule. I, and I alone, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my family without having to pass a test or go through any special process. Leveraged and inverse funds are an important part of my overall investment strategy. The proposed rule would restrict public investments to a privileged few and prohibit market access to many. No government, agency, or regulatory body has the right to "protect" me from any investment. I earn my money and I will invest it where I choose.

David Self Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Hello, I vehemently object to the proposed rule. I should have the full right to choose public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I object to any requirement that requires going through any special process before investing in complex products. Leverage and inverse funds are important tools for my investment strategies, such as using as a hedge for risk management.