Skip to main content

Paul Ito Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Dear Sirs, I am writing today re: Proposed Rule #S7-24-15. This rule should not be adopted for the following reasons: I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family, not you. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged few that you deem worthy of making that investment. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds.

Milton McKinney Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Once again the Federal Government is going to try and decide what is good for the public, the same public that pays for everything. The only person that should decide how I invest MY money, is ME. If you are going to impose a "test" in order for me to show understanding of the financial instruments I choose to invest it, I guess you're also going to reimpose the "poll tax" and "literacy tests" that people of color had to endure during Jim Crow in order to vote, yes? You must be Democrats, that's all I can figure.

Ryan Schaap Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

This has all the hallmarks of market manipulation similar to what was seen during the Bush Administration in 2008. This type of manipulation wouldn't be necessary but for the incredibly loose monetary policy and failure to properly regulate IPOs, and especially SPACs, that seemed designed to take money from retail investors and give it to insiders. You can't possibly be worried about losses on leveraged short positions when it's so easy to lose 50% or more in a short time in DASH, BTTC, PTON, NFLX, FB, CVNA, and the list goes on and on.

David Walker Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

The idea of the simpletons at the SEC deciding what investors can and can't do with their money is appalling to me. In a world where stock manipulation is rampant, perhaps there are other things you could do rather than assume that the public is too stupid to understand the risks involved with their investment decisions. Even if that were true, it should not be within the scope of the SEC to insert itself.