Skip to main content

William Martinez Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

Brokers/Market Makers should not be allowed to create synthetic shares. Brokers/Market Makers T+ settlement date should be immediate or as soon as possible, specifically no later than T+2. Brokers/Market Makers should be required to trade on Lit Markets for all trading. Communication between Brokers/Market Makers should be publicly viewable and regulated because of the ultimate impact on markets can create opportunity to manipulate price targets for speculative investments.

Justin W Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

It is clear that the integrity of the United States market has been strained to the edge of collapse, in large part due to risk resulting under the regulatory authority of FINRA's outdated, short-interest reporting policy. While many of the policies mentioned in Regulatory Notice 21-19 address the general breadth of exploitable and ineffective reporting, they also leave significant specific gaps that could compromise the entirety of 21-19's purpose.

Anonymous-BO Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

FINRA 21-19 is a long overdue change. It is clear that the integrity of the United States market has been strained to the edge of disaster, in large part due to systemic risk developed under the regulatory authority of FINRA's outdated short interest reporting policy. While many of the policies mentioned in Regulatory Notice 21-19 address the general breadth of exploitable and ineffective reporting, they also leave significant specific gaps that could compromise the entirety of 21-19's purpose.

Christine Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

The integrity of the United States market has been strained to the edge of disaster, in large part due to systemic risk developed under the regulatory authority of FINRA's outdated short interest reporting policy. FINRA 21-19 is a long overdue change. The policies mentioned in Regulatory Notice 21-19 speak of exploitable and ineffective reporting, they also leave specific gaps that could compromise the entirety of 21-19's purpose.

Garrett D Godfrey Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

We need more accountability for short positions in the market. There is far too much collusion and conflicts of interest that are not good for our markets/economy as a whole. I hope FINRA is able to provide more accountability by passing more rules for institutions, hedge funds and big players as a whole. All information regarding our markets should be public knowledge. Short positions, volumes, buy/sell orders, all of it should be 100% transparent. I stand by the 21-19 rule.

Nguyen Huu Thanh Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

FINRA 21-19 is a long overdue change. It is clear that the integrity of the United States market has been strained to the edge of disaster, in large part due to systemic risk developed under the regulatory authority of FINRA's outdated short interest reporting policy. While many of the policies mentioned in Regulatory Notice 21-19 address the general breadth of exploitable and ineffective reporting, they also leave significant specific gaps that could compromise the entirety of 21-19's purpose.

Andy Richter Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

I'm just a regular guy living his life. I want to live in a country that isn't dominated by mega-rich Wall Street corporations. I am about to have my first child with my wife and I want them to grow up knowing that their economy is free and fair. I don't want their future to be stolen by people they'll never even meet. FINRA 21-19 is a long overdue change. It is clear that the integrity of the United States market has been strained to the edge of disaster, in large part due to systemic risk developed under the regulatory authority of FINRA's outdated short interest reporting policy.

Anonymous-SUB Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

FINRA 21-19 is a long overdue change. It is clear that the integrity of the United States market has been strained to the edge of disaster, in large part due to systemic risk developed under the regulatory authority of FINRA's outdated short interest reporting policy. While many of the policies mentioned in Regulatory Notice 21-19 address the general breadth of exploitable and ineffective reporting, they also leave significant specific gaps that could compromise the entirety of 21-19's purpose.

T Brachman Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

As an international investor in the US market I believe FINRA 21-19 is a long overdue change. It is clear that the integrity of the United States market has been strained to the edge of disaster, in large part due to systemic risk developed under the regulatory authority of FINRA's outdated short interest reporting policy. While many of the policies mentioned in Regulatory Notice 21-19 address the general breadth of exploitable and ineffective reporting, they also leave significant specific gaps that could compromise the entirety of 21-19's purpose.

John J Archibald Comment On Regulatory Notice 21-19

Finra 21-19 is a change that is long overdue to the short reporting systems that have plagued the United States capital markets for too long. The institutions that have the ability to misrepresent their short exposure and subsequent effect on the markets is not only damaging to the retail Investor but the markets as a whole. The changes implemented in Finra 21-19 are not only a step in the right direction to protect the average American investor, but to also enrich and make for more transparent market for the rest of the world to have faith in.