It's important to me to be able to invest in leveraged etf's as they offer less volatility than many stocks.
It should be to the investors chose to buy stocks. If they are available and the people agree they fit their goals it is their right to purchase and sell.
i DO NOT WANT TO LOOSE OR HAVE HINDERED MY ABILITY TO TRADE LEVERAGED STOCKS AND EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS.
I want to have maximum flexibility on the type of stocks, mutual funds, and all ETFs for my investment strategy.
I AM FREE TO BUY THE DIP OF WHATEVER STOCK I WANT, AMERICA IS SUPPOSED TO BE FREE. TQQQ and SPXL FOR LIFE
What ever happened to the concept of individual responsibility? Why does government and quasi government entities think I/We are blithering idiots?
For the record: I am adult who understands risk. If I wish to invest in a high risk investment, That is my prerogative!
In short: IT IS NONE OF YOUR/GOVERMENT'S BUSINESS!!
I strongly disagree with any government or regulator-imposed restrictions regarding investment in inverse and levered ETFs. These are a key part of my investment strategy, especially in my 401(k) account where I am unable to hedge and take a short position in securities and am unable to purchase (be long) options.
Dear Sir or Madam, In short, please allow continued use of leveraged products, as available with providers such as Proshares. The risks are adequately addressed in required prospectus and I believe they serve a worthy hedge option to public investors. I support their continued availability. Thank you. Best, James Liggett
It is important for retail investors to have trading options that do not require trading options. That is a bit of a play on words, but I hope you get the drift. I don't want to trade options but I do want to be able to invest in ETFs that short the market. It is an essential part of my investment portfolio.
Dear FINRA;
Please do not add 'nanny state' type restrictions on inverse and leveraged ETF's. As an investor, I need access to a variety of investment options, including long and short leveraged ETF's.
The introduction of onerous restrictions on investing in these types of funds would not serve the public interest.
