SUGGESTED ROUTING:*
Internal AuditLegal & ComplianceMunicipalOperationsSyndicateSystemsTrading*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
New Year's Day: Trade Date-Settlement Date Schedule
Securities exchanges and The Nasdaq Stock MarketSM will be closed on Wednesday, January 1, 1992, in observance of New Year's Day. "Regular
Dear FINRA Regulators, To whom it may concern. I would prefer that you stay out of my business. The less government we have the better, is my absolute opinion. What ever I want to invest in is my concern and my concern only, not yours . I oppose any further government involvement what so ever. Leveraged and inverse funds such as (SQQQ & FAZ) are an especially important part of my strategy
Gentlemen, I am puzzled! Wall Street already has a clear advantage over the retail investor on multiple fronts including and not limited to, research, software, the speed of execution, inside information and in politics. Let us not forget the Robinhood fiasco the past year which was just one example of how markets are manipulated and front-run against the individual investor. Knowing these facts
Leveraged ETF's like QQQ Proshares or Inverse ETF's can significantly enhance returns and consolidate effort, like any fund. Why would FINRA or any gov't agency assume we as investors are too dumb to understand the risks/ benefit analysis? Right now the NASDAQ-indexed QQQ's are down because of government incompetence, throwing around money for people not to
(a) Position Limits
Except with the prior written approval of FINRA pursuant to the Rule 9600 Series for good cause shown, no member shall effect for any account in which such member has an interest, or for the account of any partner, officer, director or employee thereof, or for the account of any customer, a purchase or sale transaction in an index warrant listed on a national securities
NASD is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") a proposed rule change to amend NASD Rule 7010 to modify pricing for NASD members using the ITS/CAES System and Inet facility, which are currently operated by The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Nasdaq") as facilities of NASD.
Taking away investor rights to risk management assets like leveraged and inverse funds is robbing investors of income and simple tools which can only be emulated with complex options transactions if at all. Such regulation Hurts Investors: It could potentially deny us the freedom to choose investments that could help us achieve long-term financial security. Is Arbitrary and Unworkable: FINRAs
NASD is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") a proposed rule change to amend NASD Rule 7010 to modify pricing for NASD members using the ITS/CAES System and Inet facility, which are currently operated by The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("Nasdaq") as facilities of NASD.
NASD, through its subsidiary, The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. ("Nasdaq"), is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") a proposed rule change to exempt all securities included in the NASDAQ 100 Index from the price test set forth in NASD Rule 5100 (formerly Rule 3350).
I appreciate many of the actions that are listed. Requiring funds to post their short positions (whether synthetic or other) should absolutely be mandatory. The lack of transparency only creates opportunities for these funds to create illusionary positions and to skirt regulatory requirements. The greater the transparency these funds are required to maintain the greater the benefit to both