I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for myself and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I have managed my own retirement account for decades and leveraged ETFs are the cornerstone of my investment strategy which has been successful for me. Limiting my ability to invest in these
We would like to invest in proshares
DO NOT NEED THESE MEASURES
Public investments should be available to all of the public without having to go through any special process.
I oppose your restrictions on my right to invest in public investments.
This proposed rule is a bad idea. Making any investments is inherently risky - even the "blue chip" stocks have periods when they don't do well. Some people have a higher tolerance for risky investments than others. If they are willing to take the risks involved in buying into an investment, and they have the wherewithal to afford it, they should not be limited.
Also
To whom it may concern,
I oppose any restrictions on my right to choose to make investments in any public investment. Investments should be available to all, not just the rich and privileged. I am perfectly capable of making my own investment decisions, I don't need you to tell me what is and what isn't a good investment.
I have already lost out on tens of thousand of dollars
To Whom It May Concern - I consider the proposed FINRA restrictions to Leveraged and Inverse funds to be yet another example of the Nanny State coming to the rescue of individuals that the government and their agencies feel the need to protect. I for one am more than capable of understanding the risks of these investment vehicles and want NO restrictions on my investment strategy. L&I
The proposed limitations on certain purchasers of leveraged and inverse funds appears arbitrarily selected with no rational justification as to how it is meant to protect anyone. It appears the "protection" factor is nothing but a ruse to give an unfair advantage to professional and institutional investors - by given them privileged access to investing options not available to
Why would you allow an ETF to be EXCHANGE TRADED then remove the ability for traders to TRADE THEM ON EXCHANGES?!
Why would you even consider this action. With all of the other investment options on the market Leverage & Inverse funds are the last thing you need to worry about. If you allow options that provide the ability for a person to loss an "unlimited" amount why would you even consider changing Leverages and Inverse funds?
