I M P O R T A N T
MAIL VOTE
Officers * Partners * Proprietors
TO: All NASD Members
Last Voting Date Is September 19, 1983
Enclosed herewith is a proposed new rule under Article III of the Rules of Fair Practice. Proposed Section 38 was approved by the Association's Board of Governors and now requires the approval of the membership. If approved, it must then be filed with, and approved by,
So as we all know regular investors would like to have a fiat play on the market. Reporting more accurate short interest and positions would help us control the unlawful actions that have been hurting market for years. The people the use those techniques to make more money they would be stoped. I am AMC share holder and I want my voice to be hard we want equality we need to start making that
I applaud FINRA’s proposed rule changes and support any rule that makes short interest visible to all investors. Free and fast information leads to better price discovery for all. Buried and outdated short interest reports serve only those who have short positions they wish to remain hidden and those who abuse FTD and naked shorting loopholes to manipulate prices. These actions hurt all investors
Transparency and fairness for all investors is all anyone wants. What has been happening over the last 6 months in certain stocks is unbelievable. Hedge funds need/must be held responsible for their actions when it come to FTD's naked shorting, etc. just the same as retail traders must follow the rules set forth by the governing body. Please this is huge for the US trading markets and will
I believe in education, not restriction.
New investors need to fully understand the risks, why it is best to only commit a small fraction of their overall available funds, NEVER go on margin, and never go all-in, and understand how the overall market can seriously affect or influence the outcome of ones leveraged trades.
But I believe that does not mean these ETFs should be restricted which
I am appalled at the suggestion of limiting the free market. I - not regulators - should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privelaged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special processes like passing a test before I can invest in public securities. I am capable of understanding my
Dear FINRA, I am dismayed to hear of your plans to impose restrictions on the types of public investments that I can invest in. I am an adult and you are not my parents. I am capable of making my own decisions about what I buy and understanding what I buy. Even if I weren't, it is still wrong for regulators to try and decide who is able to participate and who is not. I urge you to
Dear Regulators: Should you limit my ability to hedge my long positions with INVERSIONS, it is tantamount to taking away my health insurance! Over the years I have effectively, and conservatively, used inverse equity positions as insurance against falling markets. In the markets TODAY, without the use of INVERSIONS I would be ruined, or out of the market. It is unwise to drive small and medium
I have managed my portfolio myself and have outperformed the market for 2022 I have done this in no small part to the downside protection offered by inverse ETFs. They allow the average investor to take short action in the market without the necessary headache of a margin account. Attempts to restrict this are misguided and will only hurt the smaller investors they intend to help. Inverse ETFs
I'm offended by the arrogant supposition that investors are somehow incapable of managing their investment risk and trading, investment, and hedging strategies. Leveraged and inverse funds are valuable and innovative tools that actually allow prudent investors to decrease/manage risk and improve tax efficiency. Any regulatory attempts to restrict the availability and utility of these
