This data provides trading volume in U.S. Treasury securities reported to TRACE for the prior day, week or month. The weekly format was discontinued as of February 2023; weekly format history is available.Treasury Daily Aggregate StatisticsTrading volume in US Treasury Securities reported to TRACE for the prior day.Treasury Monthly Aggregate StatisticsTrading volume in US Treasury Securities
It is not the role of regulators to allow what investors can or should invest in. Regulators should however look at conflicts of interest, such as congressmen and women trading individual stocks. Dont limit the options of everyday investors who are already at a disadvantage. Regulate the advantaged (make hedge funds report more information, ban individual stock trades for congress, etc.) and
It is in regard to FINRA and L&I. We don't need another regulation on the top of other regulations. My brokerage firm already provides ample warning regarding the risks. I find it sufficient trading these ETFs. I have been trading these ETFs past 25 years I know what I am doing and the risks. Government is not in the position to dictate what is good for me. No more
FINRA members that trade securities listed on the NYSE ("Tape A"), Amex and regional exchanges ("Tape B"), or Nasdaq ("Tape C") in over-the-counter transactions reported to the FINRA/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility may receive from the FINRA/Nasdaq Trade Reporting Facility transaction credits based on the transactions attributed to them. A transaction is attributed
To regulate L&I index funds is a grossly misguided decision. If FINRA seeks to protect investors from complex products, they should instead go after options, derivatives, short-selling, and other truly complicated financial practices. L&I funds are traded by average retail investors like me in the same manner that stocks are traded; they are simple to understand and necessary to
Comments: These L&I funds allow for simple day trading without the complexity of initiating margin and shorting procedures to obtain the same results. The platform on which I trade notes that these funds are not for long term investments and it details the risks. These funds are what allow me to easily outperform the market. Without them, I would need to waste an inordinate amount of time
Comments:I am an individual investor who trades ETFs. I strongly request you don't try to control my trading because you are trying to protect the person who would use a hair dryer in a bathtub full of water. In other words you can't fix stupid. So stop trying to fix it by limiting everybody else who are capable of reading and writing.
My only comment is that if an individual is on a margin account, why should they be governed by the PDT rule. Or better yet, why does this rule still exist. It is the most un-American regulation Ive ever heard of. That your organization has the audacity to try and tell hardworking Americans what how much they must have in order to day trade. This is an obvious sham, and does not exist to protect
Why would you even think about taking away our ability to trade inverse funds. Once again the government is insinuating we are too stupid to know when and where to trade the funds. I dont need you micro managing my finances. Leave well enough alone. I would also like a response on this. Greg Watson [REDACTED]. Thank you.
I regularly rely on both leveraged and inverse funds as part of my overall investment activities. The elimination of these would hinder my trading. As a retiree, I rely primarily on doing Covered Calls as a source of income. Leveraged and/or Inverse Funds provide me the flexibility to position myself regardless of market conditions. As mentioned above, removal of these would significantly hinder
