I reject your excessive oversight restricting my unimpeded right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds.
I oppose this regulation because it limits my public investment options that fit within my risk tolerance. I am capable of making my own strategic investment decisions without the government imposing limitations. I understand leveraged and inverse funds and associated risks and do not think I should have to go through a special process or test before investing in these types of public securities
I feel that if are investing in the stock market period you do not need any regulators.
Please leave leverage ETFs alone.
Me-not regulators-should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged few. Tests are controlling.
I believe everyone should have the right to invest in what Ever they want tono restrictions..
Don't treat people like children.
I oppose this proposed regulation because it is over reaching, limiting investors ability, is over reacting to a very small minority of people and does not reflect the vast majority of investors. If the mandate is to protect the public, then require wording and risks for leveraged or inverse funds. There is a place for inverse funds, particularly when markets are declining. and investors should
Hello, Surely there are more direct ways to protect citizens that are not competent to invest their own money than interfering with normal activities of average investors. Leveraged and inverse funds are regulated public securities that are easier to understand than the average computer screen used by investors. They are a part of my everyday investment tactics and do not need any further
Stop with your new world order crap. I'll need to invest in inverse funds to maintain and grow my assets when you guys decide to crash the stock market with your higher Fed funds rates, supply disruptions, etc.
