I am opposed to restrictions on my right to invest in any public securities.
I have long made use of closed-end funds and own at some now. I can't imagine that such securities are considered riskier investments than stocks.
I have purchased leveraged and inverse funds on my own in the past as part of my own investment strategies. Currently, a financial advisor I use purchases such
No politician should vote to restrict our choices of personal investment especially given the track record of politicians using material non-public information with regularity for years. Politicians did not have the ethical standards to make it illegal all those years, I see no reason why they should try to restrict inverse products in front of a potential recession and stock market drop. I&#
I should be able to maintain the right to choose my own public investments and not be forced to go through any special process in order to do so. I understand the risks and would like to maintain that I freely choose my own variety of investments including inverse stocks. What is the real reason behind this proposed restriction? The veil to the truth is very opaque and I, for one see truth and
Leveraged ETFs and options can help investors reduce their risk and be a great tool when used properly. In many cases, these tools can reduce an investors risk overall portfolio risk. To exclude their use by everyday investors is to put many of them at a disadvantage and possibly an even more at risk position. Simply buying and holding individual stocks can be much more risky, and the equities
Confidence and faith in the US stock market is decaying rapidly. I'm the poster child for this decay. Up until this year, I really wasn’t paying attention. I was under the mistaken impression that the market was fair for all participants. Over the past year, I’ve realized that this game is rigged, primarily through the essentially unregulated use of illegal synthetic (naked) shares by key
I find the fact that regulators have decided to not only limit my (and most peoples) access to the funds that we wish to invest our savings in, but the fact that regulators believe that THEY can limit when and how we do trade, much like the Robinhood fiasco. I oppose this useless regulation when time and government effort could be better spent regulating the markets, brokers, and the corporations
I not only buy cryptocurrency funds but I also buy cryptos/tokens. Also, along with these I also buy funds that track other asset classes, ETF's, bullion, both gold and silver, and gold and silver stocks. I buy large cap, small cap and mid cap equities. I buy and sell option contracts.
Why on earth are you considering infringing on the investments in cryptocurrency funds?!! Please
I strongly oppose the regulations. It is completely unfair and unethical to limit only certain members of the public from investing in what they want. The stock market should be available for everyone who wants to invest, not only for the wealthy. Regulators should not be able to determine what I am or am not able to invest my money in. I do not want or need these regulations, and they are
NASDR has filed with the SEC a proposed rule change to NASD Interpretive Material 1000-4 to make a technical correction and an amendment to the Plan of Allocation and Delegation of Functions by NASD to Subsidiaries ("Delegation Plan") to clarify NASD Regulation's authority to inspect the books and records of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
NASDR has filed with the SEC a proposed rule change to Rule 2210 of the Conduct Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. to permit the approval of research reports by a supervisory analyst of the New York Stock Exchange to satisfy NASD requirements that research reports be approved by a registered principal.
