I am very distressed to learn that someone is considering to place restrictions and hurdles to overcome for my ability to trade inverse mutual funds. Following advice of my financial advisor and educating myself about the S + P 500 index/inverse index, I have been using the strategy for several years. I AM PLEASED WITH THE RESULTS. I know the risk and reward of using inverse funds. To my
Institutions should be punished up to over 100% of their order amount and lose license to trade for naked short selling Institutions should not be able to hide their short positions using covered calls Short positions should be reported everyday
Beginning Monday, August 14, 2023, FINRA will increase the bandwidth rate for the Trade Data Dissemination Service 2.1 (TDDS 2.1) vendor feed from 2,500 kilobits per second (Kbps) to 3,000 kilobits per second (Kbps).
TDDS 2.1 subscribers should ensure their systems can accept the higher data rates. The TDDS 2.1 data rate change does not impact any of the ORF reporting applications (FIX and TRAQS
February 13, 2007
Dear NASD Member:
Last year I sent a letter to members that highlighted new and existing regulations that were of particular significance to NASD’s examination program. The letter was designed to offer you guidance by identifying areas of potential examination focus, allowing you to enhance related supervisory and compliance procedures and systems at your firm. Because the
I wanted to comment regarding the regulations being considered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). I have utilized the leveraged funds and I understand how they work. I do not feel that it is necessary to go through any special training or monitoring to trade with these funds. I oppose restrictions regarding my right to invest in public investments.
It's insulting that you would limit what we can freely trade. You'll happily tax on profits, and everyone understands the downsides to investments. This arbitrary limitation is simply another tool for you to exert power, create more onerous regulations and limit the free exercise and potential profit of regular investors.
Why must I "demonstrate a high net worth"? What defines a high net worth? Why are you being so intentionally ambiguous with this qualification? Why would an investor of "high net worth" be better qualified to trade as a trader with less net worth?
What happened to the government's position of income equality?
Dear Finra, I am writing to you because of the corruption being held in wall street by Hedge funds such as Citadel. CITADEL who carry the order flows for the excahange amounting nearly to 40% to 47%. This data was specified by Ken griffin himself when he was asked to testify in front of Congressmen in which he was accused of performing manipulative practices regarding Game stop by restricting
I strongly feel that it is my right to invest my money as I see fit, to include leveraged ETFs. I strongly disagree with any regulations meant to discourage me from doing so, or requiring a certain net worth or trading background. In summary, its my money and Id like to do with it what I like.
I personally feel that options trading is far more complex and risky than the leveraged and inverse funds which I do have access to. The leveraged and inverse funds are comparably simple enough to understand and I try to utilize it in limitation to offset my other losses periodically. Hence I feel important to have access to these funds.
