Good morning,
I am writing to discuss the impact that limiting leveraged funds would have on me as a private investor. I, as a private investor, feel confidently that I have the knowledge and experience to make personal decisions of how I invest my own money. I do not feel that it is in the purview of regulators to make determinations as to where and how I am able to use money for long-term and
I demand to have the right to choose any public investments that I deem to be right for my family. I have been making investment decisions by myself for decades. I consider this is
part of my lawful right, my freedom of speech. Further, I do not agree to be required to take any test on my investment strategy. Leveraged and inverse funds provide me the flexibility to enhance my investment
Dear Sir / Madam, I think as investors we should be able to choose the public investments that is right for me and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
We shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. The common investor is
I should be able to choose the public investment that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
Hello,
I firmly object to additional hurdles to investing. I (and the general public of mostly non-accredited investors) are not idiots, we just have less money. The tools to learn about investment and the finance industry are out there and we are using them.
Being able to participate in the market should not only be for the rich or those with finance degrees. I am against agency testing to
We should be able to choose the investments that are right for us. Being a free country, public investments should be available to all the public, not just the privileged. It is the liquidity of public investments and various investment products that keep the money flow and grow in the striving market.
We shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their
I am fully capable of choosing the investments appropriate for my situation. I should have the right to invest and take risk in anything legal investment that I see fit. It is my risk, no FINRA or anyone else's risk. Anyone investing knows they are taking the risk to lose some or all of their capital. We do not need special processes or tests to take. I already signed documents with my
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am concerned about possible restrictions to retail investors discussed in Notice 22-08. I currently personally use these types of "complex" investments to hedge against things like inflation or recession. These types ETFs make these investments accessible to people who are not institutional investors. I am concerned that the changes discussed will limit
I am writing to let you know that I oppose governing of my rights to pick what I invest in or do not invest in. There should not be tests I need to take to invest or things I need to do other than my own education of any investments that I want to invest in. Public investments should be available to anyone who is willing to learn and not be limited by people who already have more money than
