I oppose this restriction to my right to invest. Those with a high net worth have traditionally been able to invest and greatly increase their wealth. Having more wealth to invest also means that they have a lot more to lose which often applies to complex investments. These restrictions would also force the public to utilize a broker which not only incurs a cost, but often results in a much more
I am an "accredited investor". I have been managing my own savings and retirement funds for the last 33 years. During that time, I have been free to select the investment vehicles that I feel best suit my investment goals and objectives.
I strongly oppose ANY attempt by any government- or quasi-government organization to regulate or restrict my investment choices. Regulators
(a) All trades submitted to the System must be locked-in trades prior to entry into the System.
(b) T+N Trade Processing
T+N (or "as/of") entries may be submitted until 8:00 p.m. each business day. “As/of” reports of trades executed on non-business days and T+365 or greater trades will not be submitted to clearing by the System.
Amended by SR-FINRA-2013-050 and SR-FINRA-2015-008 eff
Hi, I have following comments/concerns regarding the investment choices for individuals: I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and
I am writing to ask that you do not put investment restrictions on individual investors with regards to leveraged funds and inverse funds. These funds are safer than taking out margin in my brokerage account to leverage up my positions. Inverse funds are great for portfolio management at times like this when the stock market is over valued and the federal reserve is raising interest rates. It is
It is common knowledge that markets are manipulated by large funds and privileged wealthy investors. Leveraged and inverse funds are the small investors way to level the playing field. People should have the right to make their own financial decisions. Information regarding risks is adequate to inform an investor who should take responsibility for their own actions. Passing a knowledge test does
It is not the responsibility of an outside party to decide what is best for me or my family. They have no knowledge of me or my situation. It is my responsibility to review, assess risk and act in my best interest. To that end all risks and rewards are my own. Please stay out and stop the over regulation and coddling based on your need to control and "protect the less/under informed".
Short positions should have to report ALL accurate and up to date data. The amount of shares they have shorted. There should also be a T+0 system implace. It is not fair to the average investor (retail) that these major companies Like Citadel, can know in advance what is going on, compared to retail investors having a T+2 system. Equality in the stock market is what we should have. The naked
I would like for institutions to report naked shares and synthetic shares on a regular basis. The realistic option would be design a system that would not allow naked shorting. A system that would not even make it possible for them to naked short or sell synthetic shares. It puts retail traders at a disadvantage. On a side note, hedge funds are no longer needed. It's an outdated and
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) a proposed rule change to amend FINRA Rule 6897(b) (CAT Cost Recovery Fees) to implement a historical Consolidated Audit Trail (“CAT”) recovery assessment designed to permit FINRA to recoup its contributions to recoverable historical costs of the National Market System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail incurred prior to January 1, 2022.
