This proposed action is totally unacceptable in a free country. Instituting this policy will demonstrate that this government agency, and therefore this administration, believes in totalitarianism in its truest form. Is this really what you want to do and be remembered for, bringing this beloved country closer to fascism??
Let me spell this out for you:
- In a FREE country, I should be able
I would like to express that there should NOT be any regulatory restriction for regular investors to have access to leveraged and inverse funds.
In my opinion it should be me, not regulators, that control my ability to select investment options that are right for myself.
It is my belief that public investments should continue to be available to the entire public, not simply the privileged
SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15 is unnecessary and prohibitive. Levered ETF's are a great way to invest and people who use them know the risks and rewards. Investors are not stupid and understand leverage. You do not need to place obstacles in the way of anyone who chooses to use levered ETFs in their portfolio. The SEC should not have the right to tell me what investments are or are
I should always be able to choose the investments that are right for my portfolio. Public investments like leveraged and inverse funds should be available to everyone and not just the privileged so called experts. This restriction sounds familiar to the last time the market began to pull back in 2007/2008 and I find it interesting that every time the government prints more money and the Fed
Dear regulators,
I should be able to choose publicly available investments that are right for me and my family. This filling is an over reach. Ordinary Investors like myself and others are much more sophisticated, informed, educated, and savvy than previous generations. With the the prevalence of Fintech platforms and the Internet financial education has never been easier to obtain, and reliance
TO: All NASD Members and NASDAQ Level 2 and Level 3 Subscribers
An additional 50 issues will voluntarily join NASDAQ's National Market System on August 23 and another 50 will join September 20. This will bring the total number of NMS securities to 522. (An additional 43 securities are mandated to join NMS on August 9.) These 100 securities meet the SEC's criteria for voluntary
Dear FINRA regulators: I oppose any restrictions to my right to invest. 1. If I chose a complex fund to invest into, it means I understand the risk and benefit of it after having done my research; otherwise, I would go with a standard investment retirement package. I can take care of my money by choosing where to invest without government oversight. 2. I should not be required to go through any
On October 23, 2023, FINRA announced the Small Firm Advisory Committee (SFAC) election for the Midwest and South Regions. Small firms in these regions will receive ballots via email from [email protected] to vote in this election (hard copy ballots will also be mailed to these firms). Voting concludes on November 22, 2023, and the newly elected SFAC members will take office in January
I am concerned that broad strokes are being made to decide what is overall the right investments for the American public. More and more investments are being put in the domain of "accredited investors" and it is going to prevent the American people from being successful. People, not regulators, should be able to choose the types of public investments that are right for them and their
Regulatory Guidelines to assist infringing on the rights of individuals. The only Protection anyone needs is against expansive regulatory instruments marketed to Help, Leading to the restriction of services toward willing participants. Ie: FINRA No thanks
