MUST KEEP MARKETS FREE AND OPEN.OR ITS IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE BUSINESSES MOVE, THIS INABILITY TO OPERATE AND BUY AND SELL COMPLETELY TAXLESS WHAT IS PRIVATE PROPERTY NEEDS TO STOP. BY TRYING TO CONTROL THIS YOUR KILLING A VERY GOLDEN GOOSE WHICH EXPANDS EVERYONES CAPACITY TO HAVE A BIGGER PIECE OF A BIGGER PIE
EVERYONE WINS BY TAKING TAXATION OUT OF ALL CRYPTO EQUATIONS, WE PAY ANY INTEREST TROUGH A
FINRA has no business or right to regulate or limit the products in which private investors place funds. I understand and accept the risks of my investments in all types of funds. They are my funds to invest, not yours. An investment prospectus is sufficient to inform investors of the objectives and risks of any investment. Attempting to regulate who can and cannot invest in any fund, based on an
Reserved MPIDBank NameTreasury (TS)Agency Debt (CA) & Agency MBS (SP)BACPBank of America, N.A. (Private Bank)xxBACTBank of America, N.A. (Corporate Treasury)xxBAGMBank of America, N.A.xxBMCHBank of Montreal, Chicago BranchxxBNYBBank of New York MellonxxBNSABank of Nova Scotiax BOKCBOKF, NAxxCASACredit Agricole CIBx CBKCCommerce Bankx CBNYCitibank, N.A.xxDBNYDBNY
NASD Regulation, Inc., has filed with the SEC the examination specifications and study outline for the Limited Representative-Private Securities Offerings (Series 82) examination program. The Series 82 examination program is proposed in connection with a proposed change to NASD Rule 1032 to implement Section 203 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 ("GLBA"), which requires the NASD, as
FINRA's Membership Application Program serves as the entry point to FINRA membership for firms that meet 14 different standards for admission. On this episode, we hear how the group ensures members and would-be members adhere to these standards to safeguard the integrity of the market and ensure Americans can invest with confidence.
Do not pass more regulations. I am perfectly capable of understanding risk products including leveraged funds. I do not need FINRA Nanny State regulations nor do you have any constitutional authority to regulate the private individuals investing in the markets. The constitution guarantees my personal LIBERTY, which means my personal property is off bounds to FINRA. Back off or there will be
Government regulators must not impose arbitrary restrictions on private investors.
Many capital investments carry risk. Leveraged and inverse funds are central to my investment strategies, and I do not need -- nor will I appreciate -- interference with my basic right to purchase, hold, and trade them.
There is no legally-coherent or ethically-defensible rationale for adding additional
To whom it may concern. As a private investor, I should have the ability to choose investments that are right for me, and my family.... not the regulator!
Going through special processes such as a test BEFORE I can invest in public security such as leveraged and inverse funds, is limiting my freedom as an American citizen.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important investment strategies for me
As a small private investor, I am well aware of risks associated with the various vehicles available on the markets, including inverse funds and leveraged funds. While not core, these are tools that sometimes make sense, and they should not be placed behind barriers that inhibit or even prohibit my access to them. I do not require and do not welcome regulations that block my ability to implement
To Whom it is concerned.
I oppose any further restrictions on leveraged, inverse, volatility, foreign market, or other non-traditional investment ETF, mutual fund or similar investment vehicles. As a private investor, I have the ability to read the currently required prospectuses and investment disclosures for public investments. I do not need hand holding or further government intervention or
