Attn: FINRA I do NOT want to be restricted as to when and how I invest my monies for my personal financial satisfaction. I've had to invest outside of a major brokerage; now choosing ProShares funds for this reason. I'm a senior citizen with many years of managing my own investments and am well aware of the risks life and ALL investments present and do NOT need to be further advised. Do
Im a college student so I dont have much, and Ive been investing with different platforms to secure my future. However if I cant invest in whatever company I choose, then that is ridiculous. If some investment choices are locked up to me especially because of my net worth then that is a huge infringement on my rights and I wont stand for it. Again Im a college student so I dont have much
This is government Over-Reach Constitutionally guaranteed freedoms require: I must be able to choose the legal public investments for myself and your family. These public investments must be available to all of the public, not only the privileged. Any special process or test required before investing in public securities violates guaranteed freedoms of speech and association and is only intended
Regulating my abilities and rights to invest as I see fit is my decision not yours. These types of moves are what would be expected from Russia or China not the USA.
Should I deem an investment appropriate for my portfolio it should be available to me not just the financially privileged. Are you trying to expand the economic gap that already exists between the wealthy and the no-so wealthy?
I
I strongly oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. Public investments should be available to everybody, not just the 1% and other elites. I am an adult and am capable of understanding the risks involved with investments, and should be free to place my money in investments if I so choose - there should be no special hoops or processes like passing a financial literacy test
Regulators,
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged or inverse funds. These funds are important to my investment strategies and represent a very limited part of my overall financial portfolio. These funds help me hedge my investments.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just a select few. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public,not just the privileged few. They are already holding the majority of the wealth in this country. My investment is for my future home and retirement. If this country refuses to let people choose their investments what is the point of being a US citizen? This is
I should be able to choose my own investments for myself. Choices should not be regulated and accessible only to the privileged; As an investor I am capable of understanding leveraged funds; I do not need regulating or approval measures imposed on me; These funds are important part of my portfolio and strategies; I use them as a defined percent to seek enhanced returns; I strongly feel the
I want to choose my investments and NOT have regulators restrict me. I do not want them "protecting" me. Let me take my own risks. I am a financial professional and don't want to take any test to "qualify me". If I lose my investment, I will not be looking for a bail out. It is my responsibility to assess my own risks. The only exception is if
I would like you to let me maintain my ability to choose the type of investments that I consider are best for my family's financial future. This includes my ability to invest in leveraged and inverse funds since I understand the trade details and inherent risks involved. Please do not take away my ability to freely and unhindered invest in such products. Leveraged and inverse fund
