Give your standard disclosures. Bring back the short sale rule! Keep the auto close for severe drops on the indexes. Go after the cook the book companies, and the insider trading crooks but do not deny the independent traders,investors or institutional financial firms the ability to hedge or out gain the standard index. The great thing about the United States is that one can take risk to possibly
I oppose any restriction on individual investors use of inverse or leveraged ETFs. I personally have used inverse and leveraged ETFs to protect myself during periods of market volatility as a means to limit my downside risk while keeping invested in the market. I except to lose a certain amount of money on these instruments in many instances but accept that cost because of the downsides of
I have been using Leveraged ETFs for years as part of my family's overall wealth building and management plan.
There is no reason for government regulation and limitations to be placed on these instruments, as they are an important tool in helping meet financial goals.
These are publicly traded funds that provide powerful boosts to performance for personal investors at a reasonable cost
TO: All NASD Members and NASDAQ Level 2 and Level 3 Subscribers
On Tuesday, May 10, 1983, 43 securities will join the 182 already trading in the NASDAQ National Market System. These securities have met the requirements for NMS mandatory designation, which include an average trading volume of 600,000 shares a month for six months through March and a bid price of $10 on the last five days in March
img.snapshot {
border:1px solid #cccccc;
margin-top:10px;
}
.blueButton {
background-color: #1063A0;
color: #fff;
border-radius: 10px;
display: inline;
font-size: 14px;
max-width: 200px;
padding: 15px;
text-align: center;
text-transform: uppercase;
transition: all 0.3s ease-out;
width: calc(100% - 30px);
}
.blueButton a {
color:#ffffff;
}
.
I Request FINRA to Please allow everyone to access these products. Many people use these products sensibly by allocating a small portion of their net-worths. It is not fair to allow only certain individuals to access these products, while restricting everyone else. One could buy a stock which could go to zero, is that not an unsafe / complex investment? How do you define complexity? Buying AAPL
An individual should be able to make their own choices regarding what their risk tolerance is and what investment vehicles they choose. Leveraged/Inverse funds are only a small portion of my portfolio. I use this type of an investment as a hedge to protect the rest of my portfolio as well as enhance my overall returns. Over the last 50 years that I have had an active portfolio of investments,
TO: All NASD Members and Level 2 and Level 3 Subscribers
On Tuesday, February 14, the National Market System will include 789 securities as 50 more NASDAQ securities are phased into the System. (A week earlier, 12 mandatory designations will join NMS).
These 50 securities meet the SEC's voluntary designation criteria, which include six-month average trading volume of 100,000 shares a month
Dear FINRA,
The recent democratization of investing, manifest in the rise of the retail investor, ability to trade fractions of shares, and the ability for retail investors to invest in a variety of financial instruments, has offered middle and low income people the greatest opportunity to save, invest, and build wealth. We cannot take steps back when it comes to giving people the liberty to
I am strongly opposed to any regulations that restrict my ability to buy or sell any form of financial security. Only I truly know what is best for my financial stability and what I am and am not able to participate in. Financial advice is one thing, and I am always open to such, as well as additional education and training, but at the end of the day I should be free to make my own choices when
