I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privilege.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that I am more than capable of understanding leveraged and
I use leveraged funds to hedge my accounts in volatile markets. They are a particularly efficient and inexpensive way to do that in a short-term way. Regulations make short-selling as a hedge very difficult and cumbersome; the ability to access leveraged ETFs levels the playing field for retail investors who do not use brokers. I understand the risks and decay of the instruments, but those are
I should not have to go through a special process in order to invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. We are capable of understanding the risk and do not need special treatment. Leverage and Inverse funds have helped protect my investments, but are a limited portion of overall portfolio. Please consider your important service to the health of the financial market through
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in public investments, such as leveraged and inverse funds. I should be free to choose these funds doing my own research. It is not fair that only the privileged get to invest in what they want. I have a college education and plenty of other retirement savings. I should be able to make my own calculated risks. I am also willing to attest to that
I have Best disaster in double in triple S&P 500 and NASDAQ in the investments for many years, as a result I have built up a substantial net worth. Taking these investments away from me would greatly reduce my investment returns. So long as people understand what they are buying I see nothing wrong with them. I am fully aware of the risks involved, Ive been through good times and
I am an investor who trades with New York Stock Exchange shares. In order for markets to truly be free and fair, there needs to be a level playing field for all entities involved. This is agnostic of the risks involved. Deviating from that impacts trust as it can be interpreted that retail investors have different rules from other investor entities. I do not support this rule as it's
I firmly believe that any individual, and not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for them and their families.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds.
I am
I have been investing in leveraged mutual funds for several years. They helped me earn my first and second million dollars. I hear you are considering limiting access to only the very wealthy who can also pass a test. I asked you not to do this. If you were to make regulation please at least allow those of us that could pass a test expressing a reasonable level of understanding of market risk to
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies.
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged
I have bought and sold shares in TQQQ for many years and used them judiciously in my portfolio. They were instrumental in helping me recover from the Covid correction in March 2020. I am well aware of the risks involved in owning a leveraged fund as well as the ETF decay associated with this fund. TQQQ has been extremely valuable to my investment strategy. Anything other than a broker alert that
