SUGGESTED ROUTING*
Internal Audit
Operations
Systems
Trading
*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
As of April 13, 1989, the following six issues joined the NASDAQ National Market System, bringing the total number of issues in NASDAQ/NMS to 2,838
SUGGESTED ROUTING*
Internal Audit
Operations
Systems
Trading
*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
As of March 13, 1989, the following six issues joined the NASDAQ National Market System, bringing the total number of issues in NASDAQ/NMS to 2,859
SUGGESTED ROUTING*
Internal Audit
Operations
Systems
Trading
*These are suggested departments only. Others may be appropriate for your firm.
As of December 13, 1988, the following four issues joined the NASDAQ National Market System, bringing the total number of issues in NASDAQ/NMS to 2,
This market manipulation should not be happening in the USA. A lot of people got hurt Financially and mentally. The number one reason I don't like the Short Sellers is because they are hurting the USA economy. The shorts sellers to me personally are the biggest scammers in the history of the world. They need to pay the bill to everyone including the US economy
Its a start and a move in the correct direction. I support the implementation of this providing it is all publicly reported at the same time industry gets the data. However, it doesn't go far enough to deal with the years long joke that is FINRA "playing a critical role in ensuring the integrity of America’s financial system"... maybe the cronyism can stop for all of 2 minutes and
Dear FINRA, Thank you in advance for hearing me out. I oppose regulation that would require testing, verification of net worth, broker approvals, paused trading periods, and other burdens that would inhibit my ability to control my investments and financial future. Hedge funds and inverse funds are an important part of my portfolio and allow me to protect my retirement portfolio. Additional
I am a very average investor and have been using leveraged and inverse ETFs to enhance returns for over a decade.
I don't want to have to go through training or pass a test in order to trade these funds and find it insulting that FINRA thinks so little of the general public that we're incapable of understanding the benefits and risks of leveraged and inverse ETFs.
Without
There are so many things wrong with this proposal:
-it discriminates against people based on income
-it's elitist
-it incorrectly assumes more financial education leads to better outcomes. Which is why the vast majority of investment firms under perform the market.
-unless this is announced to happen years ahead of time, it will cause people in these funds to be blind sided by the
This is a disgusting overreach by the government.
Retail investors and retail traders should be allowed to invest and trade in whichever financial products that are available to them. We sign numerous disclosures and acknowledge numerous warnings that are standard and provided by our brokerage platforms. We have the capacity to engage in this and should be allowed to take risks as we see fit, and
High risk/high return investment products should not be privileged to only the very wealthy. Index funds as such give smaller investors access to a wider array of investment tools. Trading the product requires buyers to fill out some extra paperwork demonstrating their understanding of the risk. Limiting the risk that smaller investors take on but not that of high net worth individuals seems anti
