I disagree with the proposal to restrict access to leveraged or inverse funds for several reasons:
1. It is not the government's responsibility to tell me what I am capable of investing in. It is my money, my risk.
2. It is my responsibility to determine if an investment is right for me, and to understand benefits and risks.
3. it is not the government's role to assess or
Hi, please do not restrict leveraged ETFs. They are a powerful tool for retail investors to get leveraged exposure, without having to go through margin, options, futures etc.
- I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me
- I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in leveraged funds.
- I am capable of
I oppose limitations on leveraged an inverse products.
These products are an important part of my portfolio and are useful tools for securing my long-term financial security.
Furthermore, these don't represent an outsized risk compared to idiosyncratic risk associated with investing in (or short-sellijg) individual stocks -- yet they already carry an *abundantly clear* warning --
I WHOLEHEARTEDLY OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST! This is absurd, I should have the right to invest my money the way I see fit without the interference of any kind of regulators. Public investing should be made available to the public, not just the privileged. This is completely biased and would affect people of color and other minorities! I shouldnt have to go through a special
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in public investments. I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is currently considering regulation, which will restrict our rights to buy leveraged and inverse funds and dozens of other popular investments deemed to be complex. I wholeheartedly disapprove this type of regulation, as it could adversely affect market sentiment by only allowing a select few to take advantage of these leveraged and inverse funds
FINRA should absolutely implement each of the proposed regulations. Additionally, FINRA should implement harsher penalties for violations, given that current fines are more often than not calculated into most transactions as a “cost of doing business.” Substantial compliance will not be possible until financial regulations are re-fanged. The current regulatory conditions within our marketplace,
Utterly shocked that hedge funds are allowed to poof money into existence. Where do I sign up to learn how to perform this kind of wizardry? Serious note… we look forward to new regs being enforced… otherwise, all faith is lost in the US financial system, which is easy when we’ve lost faith in our governing bodies, and zero faith in the media.. might I add… big tech can burn with them too. Is
We need more transparency in the market. We, as retail investors are kept in the dark when it comes to the "free market" while hedge funds blatantly manipulate positions using illegal trading activity. The SEC and all the regulators need to enforce the new laws that have been put into place and quit letting manipulation happen why they take handouts from these financial crooks. So in
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) a proposed rule change to: (1) amend Form CMA (Continuing Membership Application Form) required under Rule 1017 (Application for Approval of Change in Ownership, Control, or Business Operations) to conform to amendments to the Membership Application Program (“MAP
