I strongly disagree with any restrictions on any investment options available to me. My investment evolutionary tract should not be reduced by you just because there are those who have invested poorly or may do so in the future. I do not need further protections from myself nor do I need you to put more obstacles in my way. I already have to consent to my knowledge of inverse investment options
Here are my opinion:
1) Hurts Investors: It could potentially deny me the freedom to choose investments that could
help me achieve long-term financial security.
2) Is Arbitrary and Unworkable: FINRAs definition of complex products is so broad, arbitrary and vague that it could ensnare a vast number of commonly used public securities. Tests or criteria to determine investor understanding are
I deeply oppose restrictions on individuals' right to invest in popular public investments! I'm probably what is considered "middle-income", and a typical job holding American. Public securities such as leveraged and inverse funds can be a very an important part of a person's investment strategy, and I don't need restrictions imposed on me
To whom it may concern:
This is a move not only to restrict freedom but more importantly to restrict socio economic mobility. This is nothing but a way to super impose a caste system on the country to make sure the rich stay rich and everyone stays poor. There are many other ways to make sure the products offered are safe for investors than banning investors from using them unless they are
To whom it may concern:
You have zero business telling any adult citizen where and with whom they can invest their own earned, and taxed income... period!
You must know, we are fully aware of the manipulation you so-called regulators stick to retail investors. Never in my life have I witnessed the level of anger from 'the people' I'm seeing in this day, you financial
It has taken nearly 100 years to earn the right to access tools to allow the middle class options to make financial gains kept exclusive by the US founding families. In 1999 came the chance to access markets as a self directed entity . We have been smart enough to gain wealth over the last 25 years using these tools . If FINRA now takes access away, it only means the traditional founding family
I strongly agree with proposed changes. We all want a fair market but it seems that big financial institutions and regulatory institutions are failing to provide that. First shorts should been reported daily. No dark pools since most of volume is trade there, and is not reflected on regular market. Fines should be increased to same amount that you obtained through illegal practices, because right
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) a proposed rule change to amend the requirements for Covered Agency Transactions under FINRA Rule 4210 (Margin Requirements) as approved by the SEC pursuant to SR-FINRA-2015-036. The proposed rule change would amend, under FINRA Rule 4210, paragraphs (e)(
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) a proposed rule change to amend FINRA Rule 7620B (FINRA/NYSE Trade Reporting Facility Reporting Fees) to modify the trade reporting fees applicable to participants that use the FINRA/NYSE Trade Reporting Facility (“FINRA/NYSE TRF”).
Proposed Rule Change to Make Technical and Other Non-Substantive Changes within FINRA Rules
