From cryptocurrency to NFTs and other options beyond your 401(k), choosing the right investments to meet your financial goals can feel overwhelming.
I have used this product both as an advisor and now as a retired advisor, but now as a regular investor.
The availability of easy products like the inverse ETF is simple to use and should not be as restrictive as it currently is.
I find it odd, that now that the bull market is struggling, here comes the big brother regulators taking away the protection investors need.
You should NOT make this
To Whom It May Concern:
I retired just over a year ago. I had no pension at work nor any other sponsored retirement plan. I had my own investments in both IRAs and non-qualified accounts. My life has not been easy because of divorce and child custody battles, bad economies over the last 20 years, a relatively low income (mostly in the $50-$60 range) and living in high cost of living areas,
Hello, I run a quarterly rebalancing plan for my retirement that relies in part on leveraged ETFs. I have been using this system for several years now, but following its evolution for over a decade. The system is run by investor/author Jason Kelly and it's called the 3% Signal: https://jasonkelly.com/books/3sig/
Removing my access to leveraged ETFs because I don't have a $1
As a self advised , private investor I should not have any restrictions placed upon what I can choose t invest in for myself and my family. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, including cryptocurrency funds such as BITO. I fully understand cryptocurrency funds such as BITO and their risks. These investments
I strongly oppose restricting trading. Everyone has the right to pursuit of happiness per the law. Public investments are public and not private/for privileged/rich that can be assessed with a simple test that some people design who themselves may fail when assessed by people with different mindset. Similar to an education degree does not guarantee that they will become Einstein's or
I should be able to choose public investments that I feel are right for me and my family, not some government agency. This in my opinion is a government over reach. It appears that every day the government tries to usurp American citizens rights and indoctrinate each and every American citizen. This is supposed to be a free country. Let's keep it that way. i'm truly tired of
Leveraged funds have enhanced my returns, and I've only used them on a small portion of my investments, having had excellent results. As a retired broker and individual investor, I shouldn't need to have the government looking over my shoulder to determine for me what is an appropriate investment. There are far more egregious situations that are routinely ignored by those in the
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds I am capable of understanding leveraged and
I understand that youd like to restrict my ability to invest in certain investment products, namely leveraged mutual funds. I invest in these risky products only with money that I could afford to lose. I invest more than enough in broadly diversified, low cost index funds to cover a comfortable retirement. The money I use to invest in atypically risky ways is above and beyond what I need to meet
