Displaying 2271 - 2280 of 7639 Results
I strongly oppose regulators blocking investments such as leveraged ETFs and inverse fund ETFs. These funds serve a valuable investment tool with lower risk than other investment tools such as options and options strategies or even investing is some stocks outright. As a long time investor I am capable of understanding the risk related to leveraged funds and I don't require the
Hello there,
I am a long time investor in Leveraged ETFs of US indices.
I understand the risk and reward involved in it. I have more than 15 years of investing experience in Equity, Mutual Funds, Derivatives and other investment products.
I want to have my own investment flexibility with my money and do not want someone restricting it by some or the other means.
Due to market turmoil this year
I understand that youd like to restrict my ability to invest in certain investment products, namely leveraged mutual funds. I invest in these risky products only with money that I could afford to lose. I invest more than enough in broadly diversified, low cost index funds to cover a comfortable retirement. The money I use to invest in atypically risky ways is above and beyond what I need to meet
I want to thank you for your time and your commitment to helping me and my loved ones succeed in life. This is to address any concerns you may have towards leveraged and inverse funds. These are very important investment vehicles that my family and I have used over the years to help offer protection and provide investment strategies.
I believe that I should be able to choose the public
Limiting investment options is clipping the wings of the myself, an average investor, and many others, allowing those who are already the elite to profit off of a public market that was designed for the benefit of everyone. Leveraged and inverse funds allow every day investors such as myself to take calculated risk based on their investment plan. Restrictions and additional hurdles to jump
I have managed my investments for over 60 years. I have studied and invested in broad market, leveraged and inverse ETFs for the past 15 years. I use them to manage risk.
The restrictions proposed would reduce the liquidity in these ETFs and render them dangerous to use. Any regulation of these securities should strive to improve openness and knowledge of the products, promote open and liquid
I am writing to object to the subject proposed regulations. I do not believe an investor should have to go through any special process such as passing a competency test before one can invest in public securities such as leveraged or inverse funds. As with any investment, one is PERSONALLY responsible for understanding the goals and objectives by which the fund operates and the inherent risks in
No one needs this to be regulated.. some people would prefer not to use inverse funds rather than options.
Your job is not to protect us from these vehicles. I use inverse etfs and have for the last 15 years. They are a productive tool.
It is a persons own responsibility to know your own risks and not necessary to have a big brother. If a person is willing to take the risk of investing they
Investors should have the freedom to make informed decisions about their investment choices. There are those who of us who desire to use reasonable leverage without the burden of adopting complex and costly options hedging strategies. Leveraged ETFs accordingly provide significant value to us as ordinary retail investors. It is hard to imagine anyone who does even a modicum of due diligence (even
I'm opposed to FINRAs proposed limits that may restrict access to L&I Funds or to disqualify individuals from trading L&I Funds or other complex products. Limiting access to investors should never be the answer. Education of the risks should be, which is what my financial institutions have provided. As an investor I understand that a leveraged ETF has increased