I understand the risks and rewards of leveraged funds, and have used them to my advantage. However, I understand they can be dangerous in the hands of the uneducated. I believe some type of mild screening process would be useful, i.e., specialized reading materials and a test targeted at leveraged funds only, without other more heavy handed restrictions. The individual, once educated, has a right to make their own decisions. However, the same dangers could also be said of other instruments, i.e., options or penny stocks. Overregulation is always possible.

I have been using leveraged and inverse funds for a number of years to my great advantage. I would be deeply dismayed to lose access or be obstructed in their use. For what purpose - to "protect" me from engaging in a successful enterprise? To protect the public at large from "shooting themselves in the foot" or running any type of risk has never worked and never will. We have already lost enough of our freedom. Please don't do this.

My investment. My funds ..

Why do you all got to tax everything let ppl atleast try to get ahead n live off something all your doing is making more n more ppl hate the government you dont help for jack n thats facts while you get richer n help other countries we have homeless ppl n ppl barely scraping by this wouldve aloud we the ppl a chance to prevent that siince you the government are doing nothing about it

What you propose is too broad and intrusive for a free market. These instruments have important legitimate uses. One can't completely eliminate risk from risk assets. There must be some role for personal responsibility. Rather focus on education, and perhaps limits for those who are over-leveraged on margin. Apart from that, taking occasional losses is how we learn to become better investors.

Dont take away what we have now! Why would you do that? Just because you think you can. Well, DONT!

I should be able to the invest in all public investments. It's the right of all investors voices to be heard. Do not put restrictions on me and other investors. I oppose these limitations.

I've been an individual investor since 1999, and this new rule called "Reproposal of Amendments to Rule 15c2-11", if that is the reproposal in question? Well it's blatantly discriminatory since it requires a certain net worth in order to quality for equal access to all investment options. That's also known as income discrimination. As such, I strongly disagree with this proposal.

I am a very average investor and have been using leveraged and inverse ETFs to enhance returns for over a decade.

I don't want to have to go through training or pass a test in order to trade these funds and find it insulting that FINRA thinks so little of the general public that we're incapable of understanding the benefits and risks of leveraged and inverse ETFs.

Why dont you go and regulate all the corruption in the governing industry? Leave the people alone and let them make some money for crying out loud sheesh! This just like the vape industry, the people get something that is good or better for them and you [REDACTED] step in and try and control it. Leave the people alone because there are more of us than there are of you! LOL!