Skip to main content

Francis Schwartz Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I understand that you are considering legislation that will further restrict investors from investing in a broad range of public securities designated as complex products. We already receive prospectuses which spell out risks. What is your reasoning for adding more restrictions? As a small investor I want the right to invest in any publicly traded stock or ETF of my choosing. We do not need more government control. If you want to help investors take away paying taxes on investing. It is tough enough making a profit in the market without the government taking a share of any gains.

Eric Hargrave Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

There should not be any limitations for anyone wanting to trade or invest. We don't limit people other than age to drink, drive, or smoke they are far more risky than trading and investing. People know the dangers of smoking and yet people have a choice. Gambling is risky and people have a choice to gamble traders and investors should also have the chance to choose if its to risky for them.

James Roberts Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Investors are responsible for their own decisions. If someone wants to invest in leveraged and inverse funds, they should be able to do it without regulation. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just a privlieged few in society and you shouldn't have to pay a financial advisor to trade in leveraged and inverse funds. I oppose the FINRA Regulatory Notice #22-08.