Skip to main content

Chad Russell Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Government regulators must not impose arbitrary restrictions on private investors.

Many capital investments carry risk. Leveraged and inverse funds are central to my investment strategies, and I do not need -- nor will I appreciate -- interference with my basic right to purchase, hold, and trade them.

There is no legally-coherent or ethically-defensible rationale for adding additional constraints to my ability to freely and responsibly practice capitalism as I personally see fit within already-established laws and regulations.

Merle Ferry Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I don't not want my investment in leveraged S&P 500 and NASDAQ 100 index ETFs to have any more regulation than is presently in place. I feel content and confident in my investment planning with these products in my portfolio. Using the leveraged products allows me to keep more money in my CASH AND US BOND part of my portfolio to add security to my income while still achieving my total investment goals. Using the leveraged products has allowed me to keep 10 + years of income in the more secure products at verry low irates of return while having a life expectancy of less than 10 yrs.

Samarth Setru Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just privileged. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies.