1) The Investor (myself and other investors) not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for us and our family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

2) The US is a free market, anyone who does not want to invest in proShares can decide for themselves, why do the regulators need to interfere in what people want to do with their money?

Its important to me to have the ability to invest as I choose to. Additional regulations on freedoms to invest should not be put into place.

I do not support regulating areas of investment where I choose to learn, invest and grow my assets. I am an adult and perfectly capable of making my OWN decisions for my financial well being. Please stay in your lane and stop this overreach.

I am entitled to my choice of investments, be they leveraged, inverse, or crypto. Those with opinions that I must be denied my right to freely invest in any investment that I choose must be removed from positions in the government. Such limitations of rights are typical of dictatorships, whereas this is supposed to be a free country, granting freedom of choice equally to all investors. Every investor is responsible for their own decisions, choices, and elections. No opinionated government employee, regulator, or bureaucrat shall deny a citizen the right to a chosen investment.

Hi,

I am a small investor that manages a number of portfolios for my extended family. The majority of these portfolios are IRA and 410K's and the only option available in those non-margin accounts for hedging risk is inverse mutual funds. The loss or limitation of these instruments would be a great loss to the small investor.

I trade tqqq all the time. I love to trade this stock. PLEASE DO NOT TAKE AWAY MY RIGHT. FRED OLITSKY

The public should be able to invest in all the available funds. At times, an inverse fund gives the investor the ability to protect other investments with a minimum investment. Taking away this avenue of investing, you are benefiting the large investors, while placing a muzzle on the smaller investors, which, in my opinion, will lower the options of the small investor.

I am an investor in New Hampshire, I oppose this. Investors, by definition, have made the choice to invest, knowing that certain types of investments are risky. I like leveraged and inverse ETF products. Sometimes I choose strategies to limit my risk, sometimes I don't, I accept the pros and cons associated with different strategies. I value the freedom to access a broad range of investment products. I do not want the FINRA to interfere with my choice.

I am strongly opposed to this change. The current prospectus explains all that any investor needs to know. The damage that these changes will do to responsible investors is way more than any possible, small, safety net that they may provide to a few.

So retail investors maybeee lost money while the market went down, but now when the market will go back up, you can't see them make money? Lol