Skip to main content

Gregory Partenach Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I completely disagree that regulators should be able to own the right to deny me the ability to use leveraged and inverse funds. I've been trading with these instruments for a decade and they have preserve my capital, and grown my net worth. Without these instruments, I'd be in trouble. These are very important particularly in the market we are in now when I can hedge my accounts for the short and mid term with great inverse funds. I'd be even less inclined to trade and invest without these instruments.

Mary Mandel Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Leveraged and inverse funds should be available to everyone, not just the privileged. We started buying leveraged and inverse funds in 2011 and over the course of the last 11 years, we have continued to invest more in those funds as we've seen our best returns from these investments. They have also gone down in value but we do not sell when it's down. Leveraged and inverse funds have enabled our family to have a level of wealth that would not have been possible without it.

Baleshwara Indharapu Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I as an individual investor should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I am capable to understand leveraged and inverse funds and shouldn't have to go through special process of taking tests. I urge you to keep all inverse and leveraged funds available to all public to invest without any special restrictions to few of them.