Skip to main content

Louis Erb Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I do not think that the use of leveraged and inverse funds need to be regulated. Any investor who would choose these types of funds has a specific purpose in mind, either of limiting risk without having to sell off positions, or of potentially increasing dividends--for example, in retirement. These investments are not that difficult to understand and can play an important part in a moderately educated investor's portfolio.

James Perez Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have been investing in the stock market for about 50 years now. I do like to use leveraged and inverse funds to maximize my profits no matter which direction the market is moving. I know and understand the risks involved with these funds, and I should not have to prove my experience with them on each trade. I think these funds should be allowed to be traded as they are right now. They should not be made more difficult to use by the average investor by government regulations.

Mark Young Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I'm offended by the arrogant supposition that investors are somehow incapable of managing their investment risk and trading, investment, and hedging strategies. Leveraged and inverse funds are valuable and innovative tools that actually allow prudent investors to decrease/manage risk and improve tax efficiency. Any regulatory attempts to restrict the availability and utility of these investment tools to ordinary investors increases the risks ordinary investors are subjected to, and harms them by reducing potential returns and increasing potential tax liabilities.