Skip to main content

David Sourwine Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Before you restrict or remove an investors right to buy leveraged or inverse funds, you should consider that this structure allows educated investors to make these decisions without having to personally handle the underlying pieces that create these investments possible. Removal of these funds would not remove the risk, it would increase the risk as individuals do puts, calls, straddles, etc to have the desired investments.

Steven Brazell Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose, I have been choosing for myself for 4 yrs and nothing has happened to me, I spend this new money and file my taxes on it. Have I lost some money from bad projects yes, but that was my choice, but I have make more that I lost, I have gained 80% and lost 20% and I am okay with that because I learned to do my home work on my investments, see want the project is solving and there partners and how they will be part of this New Financial system is key, if they don't have good use case it is best to walk away and more to those that will help the New System.

William Hall Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Leveraged and inverse funds are in the public domain and should remain there. Any effort to restrict or hinder my access to use these funds would be unfair and viewed by me as an attempt to keep the benefits of these funds to others. I understand the risks of leveraged and inverse funds, as I do the risks of other financial investments. Again, I do not need or want restrictive measures imposed on my ability to participate in leveraged and inverse funds, and would view it as economic repression.

Dorothy Geberl Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

This regulation would be disastrous to retail investors who seek to invest in inverse funds to shield themselves from adverse market consequences, for example, by purchasing an inverse index fund as a part of their portfolio when market conditions indicate a market crash could occur, hedging against that outcome. These funds being regulated to this extent will push retail investors towards derivatives to achieve the same results, which are in most cases riskier than inverse ETFs.