Skip to main content

Trevor Taylor Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

1st as a free america. I should not have others telling me what I can invest in.
2nd adding restrictions like this will give the big guys another advantage
3rd stock options are much riskier because once they expire the money is gone. At least with leveraged funds you have an option to hold and recover just like the index they track. Some people are okay with volatility.

If you want to protect people from losing money go after gambling instead!

Scott Mootz Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my individual and family savings. I am capable of understanding leverage and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me.

Leveraged and inverse funds are important investment strategies. I use them to help hedge, seek enhanced returns, and for overall portfolio construction purposes. These are much more than simple one off trading vehicles and curtailment of access greatly impedes retail access to these useful tools.

Andrew Harvey Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

My career was in governmental regulation of utilities. I am keenly aware of the need of regulation in various markets. In this instance, however, I am opposed for the placement of conditions to invest in what is described as "complex products". As an investor, I should be able to engage in this market without having to meet conditions stipulated by a regulatory body. That is governmental overreach. Please cease & desist. Thank you