Skip to main content

James Anderson Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To whom this may concern, Please do not restrict the access of the average investor into market funds. Some of those under consideration are incredibly useful to new investors who choose to risk smaller amounts during a learning phase of the market. These proposed changes will significantly increase the barrier of entry to the average American in achieving their financial goals. Americans should always have the right to participate in the market, regardless of financial status.

Royce Knight Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the wealthy and privileged.

I shouldn't have to go through any special process in order to invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.

Leveraged and inverse funds, especially inverse funds, are crucial to my investment strategy, as I use them as a hedge to protect my other investments.

Keith Jaworski Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I strongly disagree with the addition of any new oversight related to leveraged and particularly inverse etf's. I use them to hedge/protect my family's assets particularly in periods of heightened volatility, which is becoming increasingly frequent as the machines/algorithms have taken over trading (an area that regulators don't appear to be overly concerned with). Regulators should not assume that they know what's better for investors than the investors themselves when it comes to limiting their investment options or trading frequency.