Skip to main content

Martin Halvorson Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Hello! I appreciate the ability to be able to personally invest directly in Leveraged ETFs and other Leveraged Products. I feel like there are sufficient resources available for me to make educated decisions. I would not be able to qualify as being an accredited investors yet (but will in the next few years). I think fewer restrictions on these investment products would be better for many investors in my opinion.

Peter Mudd Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Having access to inverse funds, such as the ones available from ProShares, is extremely important to me as it helps me hedge risk in my equities portfolio.

I do understand that many consumers may not be familiar with the risks so I fully support limitations on levered funds including 2x, 3x, etc. However, access to inverse funds should be kept available.

Thanks for protecting me as a retail investor!

Cheers,

Peter Mudd

David Hazen Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am not a big investor, and I believe in free and universal access to the markets. I was fully informed by my broker about the risks involved in leveraged and inverse funds, which are an important security hedge for me should the market crash. I am opposed to SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15 and urge you to consider the harmful and unnecessary limitations it would impose on myself and others like me who are not wealthy market players.