Skip to main content

Marie Slattery Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

You have no right to take away inverse etfs..It is the investors responsibility to learn how to make their financial decisions. Hmm.. seems to be ok for the government to always make the regulations to benefit them and not the individual. These etfs provide an investor utilize trades in both directions.Are you going to start regulating buying cars and houses too? Hmmm many people get screwed there tooo.. where does it start. Sales and trading is always buyer beware and it is up to the individual to educate themselves when they make their choices that is why we live in the USA.

Vasil Panajoti Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I OPPOSE TE RESTRICTIONS FOR MY RIGHT TO INVEST

I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and myfamily.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before investing in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds.
I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.

Richard Schill Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose limitations on my ability to buy and sell investments that are available to me as of this date (including inverse funds). Curtailing my ability to invest as I am currently allowed to do (all in the name of "insuring my safety") is demeaning and detrimental to my investment objectives. Leveraged funds are only a part of my overall portfolio. All investors are already given warnings regarding investing in various investment products. I certainly do not need another layer of government bureaucracy imposing more measures upon me.