Skip to main content

James Osborne Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Im disappointed yet again that restrictions are being considered to limit ordinary citizens from trading leveraged index funds like TQQQ. These funds are volatile, which is critical to my investment strategy. Its just another way to keep the economic divide in our county and keep effective investment strategies out of the hands of the poor. I strongly opposed this two years ago, and I strongly oppose it now.

Mahendra Bakshi Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am
capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I you use leverage and inverse funds to protect my investments and seek enhanced returns for a limited part of my overall portfolio.

Stephen Amadon Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose any public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just certain people.

I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest any public securities.

I are capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.

I can accept my own risks in investing.

Jay Miao Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Dear FINAR, I have been investing leveraged funds like TQQQ, UPRO, UDOW, SOXL,FAS for years. When they were held for long term, these type funds deliver extraordinary results for retail investors like me. As a wager earner and an average American , I see these type funds are only hope to get me to retirement. There are many bad risk assets in you list. The ones I mentioned are not. They are good asset types for retail investor to own. Please do not sway your agency's mission by political agenda.