Skip to main content

Ken Maxfield Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose restrictions to invest in leveraged and inverse funds and ETFs. I have an MBA in finance and understand how the inverse and leveraged fumnds work. Inverse funds are an important part of my investment process when the market is trending down. I use leveraged funds in strong uptrends and in strong downtrends. I am currently using leveraged inverse funds as a hedge to my long investments.

Robert Bridgeman Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I love the charts that the leveraged etfs provide. It gives a clear picture of contango costs that futures and options can cause on returns. The leveraged etfs provide a chart of the positives of only 33% leveraged. Futures are 5 to 1 on the SP 500 and out of the money options are super high. All investors need to be in etfs and zero mutual/hedge funds. A small percentage of a portfolio should be allocated to a leveraged SP 500 etf for any alpha of SP 500 monthly payments.

Matthew Love Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

This likely wouldn't protect as intended. Those with this risk appetite will simply search out other risky (and riskier) assets. Restricting the free market in this way will just hurt more than it will help. The risks associated with leveraged and inverse products is well documented, and all brokerages that offer them prompt with warnings before allowing trades. Adding extra bars for entry won't prevent poor traders from losing.