It is important for me to invest as I please. Leveraged investments are part of my portfolio, and I do not want that decision taken away from me. As it is a public investment it should not be placed out of my reach.

As a retail investor I adamantly oppose any limitations to being able to invest in inverse funds,

I reject your excessive oversight restricting my unimpeded right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds.

I oppose this regulation because it limits my public investment options that fit within my risk tolerance. I am capable of making my own strategic investment decisions without the government imposing limitations. I understand leveraged and inverse funds and associated risks and do not think I should have to go through a special process or test before investing in these types of public securities.

I feel that if are investing in the stock market period you do not need any regulators.

Please leave leverage ETFs alone.

Me-not regulators-should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged few. Tests are controlling.

I believe everyone should have the right to invest in what Ever they want tono restrictions..

Don't treat people like children.

I oppose this proposed regulation because it is over reaching, limiting investors ability, is over reacting to a very small minority of people and does not reflect the vast majority of investors. If the mandate is to protect the public, then require wording and risks for leveraged or inverse funds. There is a place for inverse funds, particularly when markets are declining. and investors should have the ability and choice to be hedge their funds.