Skip to main content

Daniel Jackett Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I believe your proposed limitations placed on leveraged and inverse funds is not only unnecessary, but another bureaucratic overreach predicated on the false premise that individual investors are not capable of making intelligent decisions of where to invest THEIR money.

As an individual investor since 2018 (at the age of 72), I have used expert advise and my research on investing in such funds as a portion of my portfolios. Placing undo burden on me for future such investments does not assist me in any manner, and indeeds, is a negative influence on my investment strategy.

Christopher Nelson Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. This is a free country, and a free choice is only free if citizens are allowed to make higher-risk investments at their own discretion.

William McIntire Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

The more rules the better on the Investment industry. Their only guiding principle is fleecing the flock of uninformed investors. No unproven 'vaporware' of 'investments' should be allowed without full SEC scrutiny. We do not need meme stocks, 'alternative' investments, gold, crypto and other risky investments with no underlying value to be allowed to access common investor capital.