I believe that the proposed regulation in its effort to protect investors way oversteps the line between being helpful by ensuring that investors can make informed choices and being harmful by assuming it knows best what those choices should be and who should be allowed to make such choices and who should be banned from making them. Leveraged funds have been a part of my portfolio, including my retirement accounts, since 2015. I believe they are on average less risky than investments in many individual companies.

LINGMUYI CAHello, regulators! We invest in stocks and all public investments, including ETFs, based on a portfolio of shareholders using surplus funds from the company's operations. Thanks for the risk tips for leveraged and inverse funds. Before investing, carefully evaluate the financial situation and put the company in a low-risk capital structure; at the same time, fully understand the risks and possible fluctuations of investing in these. We are completely immune to these risks. As any kind of public investment, it is open to all investors in society.

Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategy. I use them for enhanced returns and I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me.

I agree that investor education is critical and that both high level and detailed materials should be made more available that explain these products in terms that the average investor can understand. I oppose putting hurtles in the way of investors who want to use these products. Restrictions based on net worth or other financial metrics would be especially egregious.

An investors like myself should decide what are the right investments without having to go through screening processes imposed by regulators. I have been using leveraged and inverse funds for decades to enhance my portfolio's returns and to hedge against risks. Freedom to choose includes freedom to take risk. Please do not take away my freedom on how to invest.

I have meticulously crafted a strategy using leveraged funds that helps me ride market conditions as they ebb and flow. I've had wonderful results for six years now and want to continue this strategy for the rest of my life. Leveraged funds are critical to this strategy!

I, not dubiously motivated regulators should be able to choose investments that are right for my strategy. The majority of investment vehicles should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged considerating there are already plenty of investment products off limits to the public. I shouldn't have to go through any special processlike passing a test before I can invest in public securities for myself and my family. I fully grasp leveraged and inverse funds including their risks and I DON'T needregulatorymeasures imposed on me.

I need to be able to choose which strategies make sense in my investments. Please leave this tool as is.

Individual investors must always be able to choose whatever investments they decide are right for them and their family. After over 5 decades of investing, I should not be required to prove to some regulator that I am capable of responsibly handling all aspects of my financial situation. The vast majority of investors use leverage only to protect their other positions and/or to amplify the returns on a small portion of their trading portfolio. I am personally opposed to any efforts to restrict my investing rights.

I among others do not need some so called "official" your advice or help in my investing. You are only screwing up something that is part of successful investing. How have you been doing keeping inflation low ? The same thing you are trying to do here. Another successful screwup ! Leave it alone.