Skip to main content

Robert Aebersold Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To Whom It may concern:

I have successfully been investing in ProShares leveraged funds since 2012, over 10 years. Investing in the leveraged funds has enabled me to achieve an above average annual return. The wealth generated from these investments has largely been in a tax deffered Profit Sharing Plan and an IRA.
They provide me with a greater sense of mental well being, which carries over to my physical well being.

I believe this Federal Government overreach. It is a SOLUTION FOR A NON-EXISTING PROBLEM THAT CREATES A PROBLEM.

Anthony Ficorilli Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I'm just a lower-middle class investor. For the most part, the general public should be allowed to invest in inverse and leveraged funds as long as the companies providing them aren't out to scam the public with unreasonable and/or suspicious tricks. If there is something unusual about a fund, a brief-to-the-point and clear explanation, avoiding double-negative language, should be mandatory (egs. information about excessive costs/fees/commissions; other unusual risky characteristics about a fund).

Robert Crawford Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have the unalienable right to make the risk-reward analysis on investments for my account. I believe I am better qualified to choose investments that are best for me and my family. High net worth is the only measure of a citizens' ability to access the risks-reward balance of leveraged and inverse funds. One's education, business and life experiences are significantly more important than subjective third party regulator text book tests.