Skip to main content

Lori Birkholz Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I strongly oppose additional regulations on my freedom to invest in products I find suitable to my financial plans. As products that are offered to to public already have to meet many standards and regulations, adding additional restrictions limit my freedoms of choice. With increasing market volatility, investment choices should be expanded, NOT restricted. Do not approve additional restrictions on individual choice for investment options.

Thank you.

Meng Yang Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose restrictions to the right to invest.

People – not regulators – should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. Otherwise it is unfair to retail investors.

Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. For example, SH, the inverse fund of S&P 500, can be a great tool to hedge the risk of S&P 500.

Again, I strongly oppose restrictions to the right to invest!

Sergey Slyusar Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I want to have freedom to choose my investments, there is disclosure of risk already before any "risky" asset can be purchased.
I do NOT support further requirements to trade these securities, I should be the one making decisions about risk I am willing to take.

Leveraged and inverse funds play significant role in my trading strategy and investment strategy and can not be replaced.
These securities are not more complicated to understand than regular stocks.