Skip to main content

Richard Larsen Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Hello. Although I do believe that certain investments are not for everybody, restricting publicly traded investments is not the right path. Fidelity Investments has a Designated Investor Agreement to have on record that I understand the risks associated with more complex etfs and investments. I feel that is enough of a warning, but please do not restrict me from using these for my personal investing.
(Specifically leveraged etfs)

Michael McCarrell Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Stop regulation of leveraged funds We dont need more regulations about what funds I can and cannot invest in. These are public investments and they should be available to anyone who chooses to use them. These leveraged and inverse funds are critical to my portfolio strategy. I use them in small amounts to help hedge my investments. It is my hard earned money, I reserve the right to invest it insecurities I wish. It does not make any sense to have to pass a test or go through some specific process. The properties and risks of these funds are very clear, and we dont need more regulations.

Richard Wilson Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

As an investor, I utilize many products to reach my investment goals. These include products like the Proshares inverse funds. It is simply wrong to to take away the ability for an investor to invest in products like these, often used to hedge positions against market downturns and volatility. Like so many other poorly thought-out regulations, this one will hurt many investors, and is NOT needed. Making products like these available only to high net-worth and privileged investors deprives average investors from the very tools that can help them protect their accounts. It is wrong.