Skip to main content

Ronnie Rushing Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I believe the use of complex products including leveraged and inverse funds should continue to be allowed for use with retail investors for short-term purposes. Often these products can be used when volatility spikes within the markets in an effort to protect an investors portfolio. Through the use of these type of products, the investor is not required to sell specific holdings (incurring unnecessary capital gains) but can hedge their portfolio. Certainly, the use of these type of investments should be monitored to confirm prudent usage but should continue to be allowed.

Peter Lenz Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Leveraged & Inversed ETF's are important to the way I invest. PLEASE. Don't make any changes to the way these are made available to myself and other investors. I have been trading triple leveraged TQQQ, SQQQ, TECL, TECS, TNA, TZA, UPRO, SPXU and many others since June 2006 and have never had a problem and can't understand why anyone thinks there is a problem. Please, I beg of you don't make any changes. Sincerely. Peter Lenz

Litang Gao Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I, as an individual investor, OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST in leveraged investment products.

I should be able to choose the public investment products that are right for me and my family. All investment conmmunity should have equal right to access to public investment products, not just the privileged.

I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding the risks and rewards associated with leveraged investment products.

Alexander Wright Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Ah yes, quite a brilliant regulatory notice. Only us ~~~~sophisticated~~~~~~~~ investors are worthy enough to trade such complex financial instruments. The peasantry are wholly incapable of understanding the Bitz-Coins on our academic level. The only issue with this proposal is that it does not go far enough to """""protect"""" retail investors from their own stupidity. Many individual stocks are delisted from exchanges every year.