Skip to main content

Matt Elley Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

We should have the right to use inverse funds and leverage if we choose to as they provide hedges for market cyclicality. They also help to "make" markets. I've had an investment in inverse funds for years which has lost money but it hedges my other positions. Now if I'm force to sell these I'll loose all that potential value that I would gain back in a correction cycle. If you take that right from me it unfairly allows me to regain the losses I've incurred. Let markets operate freely and investors make their own choices.

James Zehe Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I believe it is my right to choose what public investments are right for me and my family, I also believe they should be available to all, not just the privileged few. I do not believe it is right to require a test before I can invest in leveraged and inverse funds. These are only a small part of my investments, however they help enhance and protect my investments overall.

I believe that the SEC should be working for my and other citizens interests, and not those who would hold us down.

Pinchas Kohler Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I would like to request that FINRA not restrict our ability to purchase leveraged and inverse funds.
Modern Portfolio Theory postulates that our main resource for profit is a function of risk. Almost any investment can have its risk dialed up or down to meet our financial needs.
So, it is prudent to allow all investors the ability to decide for themselves and take personal responsibility for their investment decisions. We cannot decide that one should pick individual stocks instead of leveraged Treasuries or gold for example.