Skip to main content

Doug Oerlich Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I believe it is completely unreasonable to restrict my ability to invest in instruments that I deem appropriate for myself. Im an adult and this is the United States of America - I dont need to be coddled and protected as to what I want to invest in. Furthermore, these instruments are completely legal, the proposal is just to keep them for people who already have a lot of money, thereby widening the wealth gap because those of higher means will continue to have access.
Bad legislationcancel the effort.

Richard Vetter Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have invested for over twenty years. In the beginning I did not know much, but I learned. Did I make mistakes? Sure. But I knew there were risks. As long as someone can document that they understand investing involves risk and loss, they should be able to invest in any legal arrangement. To not allow or to put up barriers to entry, would just be forcing the younger and poorer to stay un-invested and less advantaged.

Robert Allen Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Leveraged funds allow investors to take on a relatively cheap form of leverage without risking margin call or needing to deal with the tax implications of rolling futures or options contracts. It shouldn't be the government's job to force investors to make what they consider "safe" investments, and in the digital age investors are only a google search and an hour away from learning about the additional risks of leveraged ETFs, such as volatility drag and fees.