Skip to main content

Jonathan Pullen Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

This feels a lot like A: nanny states attempting to protect us from ourselves in ways said nanny states don't succeed in protecting *themselves* - I think a government with as much debt as the US govt has has no business telling anyone how to run their money B: a set of rules which advantage the rich while screwing over the rest of us - as per usual, rules for thee, not for me, since I bet you're still going to let "accredited investors" make all the big money gains.

Renee Renfer Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I don't think it is right for Regulators to take control of how the public wants to invest in the future of their families, your trying to make the rich get richer once again, middle class people don't have a chance again, when a good thing comes along that's when regulators want to take over, where were you when crypto was just getting started, you didn't believe in it but now that you see its going to make a big difference to the world economy you want in. I don't have to take a test for any other stocks I own so why should I have to take one for crypto?

Mark Padden Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

There is no reason individual investors should be denied access to an efficient vehicle of ownership of an entire asset class. Forcing individuals to seal with complex futures and/or expensive and risky crypto exchanges only deepens the gulf in access between inst. (wealthy) and indiv. (middle class) investors. Per federal law, it is legal for any US citizen to own crypto currency. If there are any restrictions that need to be implemented, they should be done by our legislative branch of government (Congress), not via arbitrary restrictions drawn up by a handful of people at FINRA/SEC.

Anonymous Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I - not regulators – should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to ALL of the
public, not just the privileged.

• I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am quite capable of
understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
I do not need your measures imposed on me

David Saleh Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I do not support this rule change. Using leveraged etfs has been essential to many retail investors including myself. They have helped me hedge my portfolio in certain times and generate excess returns during other times. If you take leveraged etfs away it will cause retail investors such as myself to lose a lot of money, especially if you take these away while the market is far down from all time highs. Please do not impose anymore regulations on leveraged etfs.