Comments: Please do not limit investors' ability to trade "complex products" including leveraged and inverse funds. These products are not confusing. If you want to make sure investors are aware of what they are investing in then have them read a waiver in advance. Otherwise, there should be no restriction on what a private investor should be able to invest in in this manner.

Regulators should not choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. I should not have to go through any special process to invest in public securities. I understand the risk associated with alternative investments and should have the right to do as I choose with my own capital.

I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in crypto. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

Comments: Please do not limit our ability to buy and sell inverse and leveraged ETFs. They are not that complicated and the warning notices that come up before any purchase is quite detailed and informative to anyone who does not understand these products.

It is the responsibility of regulators to ensure funds are well managed, safe from fraud and equally accessible to all investors. It is not the responsibility of regulators to determine which funds specific investors are allowed to purchase. Regulators must not require any tests or assessments in an effort to "weed out" or discriminate against investors. Cryptocurrency funds are an integral part of my own investment strategy. Cryptocurrency funds have been shown to REDUCE risk by decorrelating from the market.

More options is better than less. Considering you did nothing about SPACs for the last 2 years, it's rich to hear that you care about protecting investors now.

I disagree with further retail investor limitations. There are countless resources available for retail investors to utilize in order to learn about leveraged ETFs and other complex investments. Additionally, these investments pose no greater financial risk than any other individual stock investment, which, if the last 2 years have shown us anything, can be even more volatile than cryptocurrency/leveraged ETFs, etc. Nikola, Peloton, and Netflix immediately come to mind as stocks that lost 50% of value or more in a very short time span. I strongly oppose more retail investor limitations.

Please do not ban these products they are beneficial to future savings

The Government already taxes profits on Crypto. I am not in support of this further encroachment of my rights to invest in alternative investments to act as a counterbalance to the overpriced stock market cause by the fed's QE*** purchases. First, Crypto should not be under the SEC as it is not a security, it is closer to a commodity. Second, the SEC is over-reaching it authority even if it is a Security. Effectively banning Crypto would then mean that if someone were to start using the e-money that the US is thinking about doing such also be banned.

This does nothing but hurt individual investors. When people start the argument with "think of the children" it's usually not good.